- Subsidies begin for small businesses to provide coverage to employees. (2010)
- Employers with more than 50 employees that don't provide affordable coverage must pay a fine if employees receive tax credits to buy insurance. Fine is up to $3,000 per employee, excluding first 30 employees. (2014)
- Subsidies for small businesses to provide coverage increase. Businesses with 10 or fewer employees and average annual wages of less than $25,000 receive tax credit of up to 50% of employer's contribution. Tax credits phase out for larger businesses. (2014)
- Businesses with more than 100 employees can buy coverage on insurance exchanges, if state permits it. (2017)
It is my opinion that by mandating that businesses supply their employees with health care the current average quality of business owner-employee relations can only improve. By carrying the responsibility of providing their employee's with health care, business owners will think twice about who they hire, and develop stronger relationships with the people they do hire. This is because their cost per employee is higher, so the risks of hiring a sub-par employee are higher. Basically, I predict that employee retention rates will rise, although many analysts state that we are growing into a more transient job market. However, the potential downside of this mandate is that the additional costs of providing health care might limit new hires for small and medium sized businesses. Hopefully by the time that businesses must start providing these services-starting 2014-the economy will have recovered to a state that more closely resembles 2006. By providing subsidies for small businesses this year, the Obama administration is trying to pressure the private sector into making the change now, instead of waiting for 2014. Overall, I think this bill is good thing for businesses and consumers because it provides more opportunities for coverage. Of course, I personally believe that health care is a basic human right and should be guaranteed to all citizens at birth- so I might be a little biased when analyzing how the bill will effect small businesses. In the end, it is up to economic s to decide how it will all turn out. And economics is often counter intuitive to say the least.

I agree with you in that health care is a human right. It is extremely unfair for millions of people to be dying of treatable and curable diseases because they can't afford to pay for doctors and medications. Millions of people have been neglected for decades and it's time for change.
ReplyDeleteThat's the part of the bill I was most worried about since I'm examining musician healthcare. It's a shame to me still that record labels dont offer their artists healthcare, and arent required to, but what also struck me is that small indie record labels might not even have the funds to offer employees basic healthcare.
ReplyDeleteHopefully, this little part of the bill will spark change for small business to give all employees healthcare. I can only hope one day that this will be extended to the musicians too.(since their talent drives the label economically, it only makes sense...)
Well is definetly sounds like this is a great thing for businesses. It might cost a little more, but I don't think the extra cost will close the doors of a million new businesses. Health care is just something everyone needs to have.
ReplyDelete